Things We Grew Up Loving: A Meditation on Memory, Meaning, & A Search for Ourselves

Pujit Siddhant

Feb 13 2025

<div class='bc_element' id='bc_element'1 style=' background:#null;color:#null;font-family:null;width:auto;padding:5px;max-height:100%;'><span><p><b>The Echo of Childhood: Why We Keep Returning</b></p><p><br></p><p>There is a moment in childhood when the world is vast yet intimate, boundless yet within reach. We are too young to be burdened by the weight of existential questions yet old enough to feel the intensity of life in its smallest moments. A toy, a melody, a bedtime ritual—these are not just pastimes; they are encounters with the first stirrings of selfhood. We do not recognize them as such at the time. Only later, much later, do we realize that these seemingly trivial things—cartoons, board games, birthday candles, the hum of an old radio—were more than just distractions. They were the foundation of who we were before we had the language to define it.</p><p><br></p><p>As we grow older, something strange happens: we start to see childhood not just as a time but as a place—one we have left behind, one we can never return to. The things we once loved remain fixed in time, untouched by change, while we are propelled forward, accumulating responsibilities, expectations, and a mounting pressure to be efficient. And yet, we return.</p><p><br></p><p>To hear the opening chords of the Super Mario theme, to unwrap a Chupa Chups Lollipop just the way we did as children, to pick up a yo-yo and feel its familiar rhythm—it is not mere nostalgia. It is an act of retrieval. It is an attempt to touch something that still feels like home, even when home itself has been redefined a hundred times over.</p><span></div><a href='null'><div id='bc_element'1 ><img height='400px' width='auto;' class='img_dynaPost' src='/BlitzMobiImages/consumers/company551995499/mediafiles/rRKJRJ7b581.tmp'/></div></a><div class='bc_element' id='bc_element'1 style=' background:#FFFFFF;color:#000000;font-family:Verdana;width:auto;padding:5px;max-height:100%;'><span><p><b>The Weight of Memory and the Persistence of Play</b></p><p><br></p><p>Memories are not linear recollections; they are layered imprints, sometimes dormant, sometimes unexpectedly vivid. They attach themselves to objects, sounds, scents, and rituals, weaving them into the fabric of our identities. A Pokémon card is not just a piece of cardboard—it is the memory of trading on the school bus, of opening a fresh pack and hoping for something rare, of believing, even momentarily, in the magic of chance.</p><p><br></p><p>The small rituals of childhood carried an intensity that is often absent in adulthood. We did not just play Monopoly; we lived inside it for hours, fighting over fake money as if real stakes were at hand. We did not just own Transformers action figures; we animated them, built universes with them, projected onto them a sense of agency we ourselves were just beginning to understand. The Beyblade battles that unfolded on playgrounds and classroom desks were not about the toys themselves, but about the unspoken competition, the triumph of skill, the fleeting but fierce camaraderie of childhood rivalries.</p><p><br></p><p>What was it that made these things so consuming? Perhaps it was the clarity of purpose they provided. Childhood is a time when the lines between real and imaginary are blurred, when play is not an escape but an essential mode of being. But the world teaches us to outgrow these things, to trade wonder for practicality, immersion for detachment. And yet, something inside us resists.</p><p><br></p><span></div><a href='null'><div id='bc_element'1 ><img height='400px' width='auto;' class='img_dynaPost' src='/BlitzMobiImages/consumers/company551995499/mediafiles/HfG7g4pf582.tmp'/></div></a><div class='bc_element' id='bc_element'1 style=' background:#FFFFFF;color:#000000;font-family:Verdana;width:auto;padding:5px;max-height:100%;'><span><p><b>Why We Seek What We Have Left Behind</b></p><p><br></p><p>It is tempting to say that nostalgia is simply the mind longing for a time when life was simpler. But the pull of childhood is not just about ease—it is about depth. It is about the way we once engaged with the world, unguarded and without expectation. The things we return to—our old toys, familiar games, childhood foods—are not just reminders of a different era. They are reminders of a different way of being.</p><p><br></p><p>A family road trip was not merely about the destination but about the in-between moments—the snack breaks at roadside diners, the crumpled maps that never quite folded back the right way, the quiet sense of adventure in watching landscapes blur past the car window. A birthday party was not just about cake and gifts but about the ritual of anticipation, the act of donning a paper crown and believing, for a day, in the spectacle of celebration.</p><p><br></p><p>These moments were not just fragments of the past; they were formative. They shaped our understanding of joy, connection, and identity. And when we revisit them, it is not merely to relive them, but to ask ourselves: What have we done with that part of us? Where did it go? Is it still there, waiting?</p><p><br></p><p><b>The Tether of the Tangible</b></p><p><br></p><p>Childhood was a time of objects—tangible, weighty things that we could hold, collect, cherish. A Game Boy was not just a console; it was the companion of long car rides, the secret escape under the covers past bedtime. A G.I. Joe figure was not just a toy; it was the protagonist of countless imagined battles, a stand-in for a kind of bravery we had yet to understand in ourselves.</p><p><br></p><p>Technology has changed the way we engage with the world. Our interactions are increasingly intangible, our entertainment frictionless. Music streams instantly rather than being rewound in cassette players. Video games are downloaded in seconds rather than being swapped between friends. Convenience has made things easier, but in doing so, has it diluted the anticipation, the ritual, the tactile joy of ownership?</p><p><br></p><p>Perhaps this is why so many of us return to the things we once touched, once held with reverence. A PS1 disc, a friendship bracelet, a handwritten letter from a childhood pen pal—these are more than artifacts. They are proof of our former selves, tangible anchors in a world that often feels too fast, too fluid.<br><br><p data-pm-slice="1 1 []">A <i>Barbie</i> doll, too, was more than just a toy. It was a portal into storytelling, into shaping miniature worlds where we controlled every detail. Whether it was dressing her up for an imaginary gala or creating elaborate adventures with friends, Barbie allowed children to explore identity, creativity, and aspiration before they even had words for such things. It wasn’t just about the doll—it was about the narratives built around her, the moments of shared play, the sense that anything was possible</p></p><span></div><a href='null'><div id='bc_element'1 ><img height='400px' width='auto;' class='img_dynaPost' src='/BlitzMobiImages/consumers/company551995499/mediafiles/6mashzAd583.tmp'/></div></a><div class='bc_element' id='bc_element'1 style=' background:#FFFFFF;color:#000000;font-family:Verdana;width:auto;padding:5px;max-height:100%;'><span><p><b>Reclaiming the Child Within</b></p><p><br></p><p>But what if nostalgia is not about looking back at all? What if it is about remembering forward? What if the past does not call us to dwell in it but to take something from it—an old instinct, a lost pleasure, a way of seeing—and bring it into the present?</p><p><br></p><p>What if we played again, not out of regression, but out of recognition? What if we rediscovered the joy of a game not for competition, but for the sheer delight of participation? What if we allowed ourselves to be excited by small things—a song that reminds us of middle school summers, a familiar snack we once saved up pocket money for—without apologizing for the sentimentality of it? What if, instead of dismissing nostalgia as wistfulness, we saw it as a map—a guide back to something essential, something unspoiled, something still within reach? Maybe the real tragedy of growing up is not that we leave childhood behind. It is that we forget that some parts of it were never meant to be abandoned at all.</p><p><br></p><p>On this February 14th, while the world celebrates love in its many forms, perhaps we should also celebrate another kind of love—the love we once had for life itself. The love that existed before it had to be earned, before it had to be justified. The love that lived in the smallest moments, in the simplest pleasures, in the things that, even now, even after all these years, still find their way back to us.</p><p><br></p><p>Because some loves do not belong to the past. Some loves are waiting for us to remember.</p><span></div><a href='null'><div id='bc_element'1 ><img height='400px' width='auto;' class='img_dynaPost' src='/BlitzMobiImages/consumers/company551995499/mediafiles/t3YmAt2n584.tmp'/></div></a>

Other stories

Powered by RADAR108